2022

de Castro, Pablo; Herb, Ulrich; Rothfritz, Laura; Schöpfel, Joachim
The role of research funders in the consolidation of the PID landscape Technical Manual
Exchange, Knowledge (Ed.): 2022.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Case Study, Peristent Identifier, PID, PID landscape, Research funders, Research Funding Organizations
@manual{de_castro_pablo_role_2022,
title = {The role of research funders in the consolidation of the PID landscape},
author = {Pablo de Castro and Ulrich Herb and Laura Rothfritz and Joachim Schöpfel},
editor = {Knowledge Exchange
},
url = {https://zenodo.org/record/7258209
https://scidecode.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/The-role-of-research-funders-in-the-consolidation-of-the-PID-landscape.pdf},
doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.7258209},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-11-29},
urldate = {2022-11-29},
publisher = {Zenodo},
abstract = {This case study is part of a series that has been produced within the study on “Risks and Trust in pursuit of a well-functioning PID infrastructure for research” commissioned by the Knowledge Exchange in July 2021. The main outcome of this work will be a report examining the current PID landscape with an emphasis on its risks and trust-related issues. This initial case study aims to explore the key role research funders are expected to play in the gradual adoption of an ever wider range of PIDs across European countries. The study examines matters such as the endorsement of PIDs by research funders and opportunities for cross-funder collaboration. In addition it looks at the potential differences in the technical workflows for PID adoption among others. The report, "Building the Plane as We Fly It”: the Promise of Persistent Identifiers, and remaining complementary case studies will be published soon.},
keywords = {Case Study, Peristent Identifier, PID, PID landscape, Research funders, Research Funding Organizations},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {manual}
}

de Castro, Pablo; Herb, Ulrich; Rothfritz, Laura; Schöpfel, Joachim
Some reflections on the current PID landscape – with an emphasis on risks and trust issues Journal Article
In: Procedia Computer Science, vol. 211, pp. 28–35, 2022, ISSN: 18770509, (Part of special issue: 15th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Peristent Identifier, PID, PID landscape
@article{de_castro_reflections_2022,
title = {Some reflections on the current PID landscape – with an emphasis on risks and trust issues},
author = { Pablo de Castro and Ulrich Herb and Laura Rothfritz and Joachim Schöpfel},
editor = {Miguel-Angel Sicilia, Pablo De-Castro, Sadia Vancauwenbergh, Ed Simons, Orel Ognjen},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877050922016386
https://scidecode.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1-s2.0-S1877050922016386-main.pdf},
doi = {10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.173},
issn = {18770509},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-11-24},
urldate = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Procedia Computer Science},
volume = {211},
pages = {28--35},
abstract = {The current landscape around persistent identifiers (PIDs) keeps quickly evolving. Some PIDs like Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for publications and datasets or ORCIDs (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) for persistent author identification are already well-established, but there is also a whole additional range of emerging identifiers in the research area, often being implemented under competing approaches. These include among others identifiers for organisations (OrgIDs), for research grants (grantIDs), and projects (RAIDs), for research equipment and facilities (PIDINSTs) and for physical samples (IGSNs).
This is then a timely moment to explore the risks and trust-related issues associated with an ever wider implementation of PIDs. Following an earlier work on ‘risks and trust in pursuit of a well-functioning Persistent Identifier infrastructure for research’ conducted by the Knowledge Exchange (KE) Task & Finish Group on PIDs, the KE commissioned a study in July 2021 to look deeper into these issues. This work, undertaken by the signatories of this paper, will result in the publication of a report and a series of case studies on specific areas of current PID development. At the time the CRIS2022 Conference takes place the work is still underway, but already advanced enough to describe its methodology, early findings, landscape analysis and early recommendations. The full project results are expected to be published by the KE by the end of 2022.},
note = {Part of special issue: 15th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems},
keywords = {Peristent Identifier, PID, PID landscape},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This is then a timely moment to explore the risks and trust-related issues associated with an ever wider implementation of PIDs. Following an earlier work on ‘risks and trust in pursuit of a well-functioning Persistent Identifier infrastructure for research’ conducted by the Knowledge Exchange (KE) Task & Finish Group on PIDs, the KE commissioned a study in July 2021 to look deeper into these issues. This work, undertaken by the signatories of this paper, will result in the publication of a report and a series of case studies on specific areas of current PID development. At the time the CRIS2022 Conference takes place the work is still underway, but already advanced enough to describe its methodology, early findings, landscape analysis and early recommendations. The full project results are expected to be published by the KE by the end of 2022.

de Castro, Pablo; Herb, Ulrich; Rothfritz, Laura; Schöpfel, Joachim
Some reflections on the current PID landscape – with an emphasis on risks and trust issues Presentation
12.05.2022.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Peristent Identifier, PID, PID landscape, Research Information Management
@misc{de_castro_reflections_2022b,
title = {Some reflections on the current PID landscape – with an emphasis on risks and trust issues},
author = { Pablo de Castro and Ulrich Herb and Laura Rothfritz and Joachim Schöpfel},
url = {https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/1960},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-12},
urldate = {2022-05-12},
publisher = {euroCRIS},
abstract = {The Knowledge Exchange (KE) is a European partnership formed by six key national organisations tasked with developing infrastructure and services to enable the use of digital technologies to improve higher education and research. These six organisations are CSC in Finland, CNRS in France, DeiC in Denmark, DFG in Germany, Jisc in the UK and SURF in the Netherlands. One specific area of activity for KE – as part of its collaborative work to support the development of digital infrastructures to enable open science – is the analysis of the quickly evolving persistent identifier (PID) landscape, and in particular the issues around risks and trust in pursuit of a wellfunctioning Persistent Identifier infrastructure for research. Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) and their associated infrastructures are considered to be of vital importance for accountability, reproducibility and credibility of today’s research. PIDs foster transparency in methods and scientific output, identification and referencing of scientific outputs, and thus contribute to Open Science and Open Scholarship. Back in June 2021 the KE Task & Finish Group for PIDs Risk and Trust (see its composition here) commissioned an external study to explore the risks and trust issues associated with the current PID landscape. The winning bid, issued by a team of four consultants in Germany, France and the UK under the banner of Scidecode Science Consulting, included two members of the euroCRIS Board among the experts to carry out this analysis. An early project presentation was delivered on Dec 8th, 2021 within a webinar on PID implementation organised by ORCID and DataCite for the Research Information Management community in Poland. In this short presentation the project methodology, objectives and time schedule were briefly described. The project work – which will be fairly advanced by the time the CRIS2022 conference is held, hence the usefulness of having the opportunity to present its early findings for a discussion with the RIM community – is to be based on a number of interviews with PID experts in (mostly) the six KE member countries. The interviewees will represent the six main PID roles identified in the scoping document drafted by the KE T&F Group under the title "Risk and trust in pursuit of a well-functioning PID infrastructure for research" (these are PID Authority, PID Service Provider, PID Manager, PID Owner and PID User). Source: OpenAIRE “What is a Persistent Identifier?”, https://www.openaire.eu/what-is-a-persistent-identifier. Image licence CC BY 4.0 At the timmid-– most interviews have already been conducted as part of e of writing January 2022 the first stage of this project. Both well established PIDs such as DOIs, ORCID and ROR and other, emerging infrastructure for persistent identification (such as confe rence IDs or identifiers for research equipment and facilities) have been addressed in these conversations with the experts. Other more decentralised IDs such as handleIDs, URNs, ARKs or IGSNs have also been covered, providing a thorough insight into a rat her complex current PID landscape. A literature study was carried out by the project team prior to the interviews examining the issues of risk and trust, whose results were used to draft a default template for the questions to be asked to the experts. A number of case studies will be produced summarising some of the findings of these interviews, followed by a report that will address the most pressing issues related to risk and trust in the current PID landscape. As per the project timeline, a collecti on of case studies in PID implementation and operation should be close to completion by the time the CRIS2022 conference takes place. The proposed presentation at the conference aims to introduce these case studies and to provide a summary snapshot of the current PID landscape and its relevance for related initiatives like the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Emphasis will also be made on the key role of PIDs in Research Information Management Systems.},
keywords = {Peristent Identifier, PID, PID landscape, Research Information Management},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {presentation}
}
2020

Herb, Ulrich; Geith, Uwe
Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen: Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA Journal Article
In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, vol. 71, iss. 2-3, pp. 77–85, 2020, ISSN: 1619-4292, 1434-4653, (Publisher: De Gruyter Saur Section: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Closed Access, Open Access, Qualität, Qualitätskriterien, Wissenschaftliche Publikationen, Wissenschaftliches Publizieren
@article{herb_kriterien_2020,
title = {Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen: Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA},
author = { Ulrich Herb and Uwe Geith},
url = {https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/iwp/71/2-3/article-p77.xml
https://scidecode.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/10.1515_iwp-2020-2074-5-1.pdf
},
doi = {10.1515/iwp-2020-2074},
issn = {1619-4292, 1434-4653},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
urldate = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis},
volume = {71},
issue = {2-3},
pages = {77--85},
abstract = {Dieser Beitrag beschreibt a) die Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie zur qualitativen Wahrnehmung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, b) die Konstruktion eines daraus abgeleiteten Kriterienkatalogs zur Wahrnehmung der Qualität wissenschaftlicher Publikationen sowie c) der Überprüfung dieses Katalogs in qualitativen Interviews mit Wissenschaflterinnen und Wissenschaftlern aus dem Fachspektrum Chemie, Physik, Biologie, Materialwissenschaft und Engineering. Es zeigte sich, dass die Wahrnehmung von Qualität auf äußerlichen und von außen herangetragenen Faktoren, inhaltlichen / semantischen Faktoren und sprachlichen, syntaktischen sowie strukturellen Faktoren beruht.},
note = {Publisher: De Gruyter Saur
Section: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis},
keywords = {Closed Access, Open Access, Qualität, Qualitätskriterien, Wissenschaftliche Publikationen, Wissenschaftliches Publizieren},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2017

Herb, Ulrich
In: Weingart, Peter; Taubert, Niels (Ed.): The Future of Scholarly Publishing: Open Access and the Economics of Digitisation, African Minds, pp. 135-164, African Minds, Capetown, South Africa, 2017, ISBN: 78-1-928331-53-7.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Open Access, Open science, Scientific Publications, Scientific Publishing
@incollection{herb_ulrich_2017_1035734,
title = {Recommendations, Statements, Declarations and Activities of Science Policy Actors on Shaping the Scholarly Communication System},
author = {Ulrich Herb},
editor = {Peter Weingart and Niels Taubert},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1035734
https://scidecode.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Herb_AM-Future-of-Scholarly-Publishing-TEXT-WEB-05Oct2017-146-175.pdf},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.1035734},
isbn = {78-1-928331-53-7},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-10-01},
urldate = {2017-10-01},
booktitle = {The Future of Scholarly Publishing: Open Access and the Economics of Digitisation, African Minds},
pages = {135-164},
publisher = {African Minds},
address = { Capetown, South Africa},
abstract = {During the past ten years, different actors from the science policy sector have made different statements on the future design of the scholarly communication system. Moreover, they have been active in trying to change the design. The goal of this text is to give an overview of the different forms of those statements for Germany, the United States and Europe, and to summarise the content of the statements in the form of a synopsis in which the major similarities and differences can be fleshed out. In addition, experts have to determine the most important fields of activity and describe concrete measures and activities. The object of this chapter is to discuss the scholarly communication system through which research results are disseminated and exchanged within the scientific community.},
keywords = {Open Access, Open science, Scientific Publications, Scientific Publishing},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}
2016

Herb, Ulrich
In: Weingart, Peter; Taubert, Niels (Ed.): Wissenschaftliches Publizieren, pp. 147-177, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2016, ISBN: 978-3-11-044811-5.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Open Access, Open science, Wissenschaftliche Publikationen, Wissenschaftliches Publizieren
@incollection{weingart_empfehlungen_2016,
title = {Empfehlungen, Stellungnahmen, Deklarationen und Aktivitäten wissenschaftspolitischer Akteure zur Gestaltung des wissenschaftlichen Kommunikationssystems},
author = { Ulrich Herb},
editor = { Peter Weingart and Niels Taubert},
url = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110448115-006/html
https://scidecode.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/10.1515_9783110448115-006.pdf},
doi = {10.1515/9783110448115-006},
isbn = {978-3-11-044811-5},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2016-01-01},
booktitle = {Wissenschaftliches Publizieren},
pages = {147-177},
publisher = {De Gruyter},
address = {Berlin, Boston},
abstract = {In den vergangenen zehn Jahren haben sich unterschiedliche wissenschaftspolitische Akteure in verschiedener Weise zur künftigen Gestalt des wissenschaftlichen Kommunikationssystems geäußert und Aktivitäten unternommen, mit denen konkrete Gestaltungsabsichten verfolgt werden. Ziel dieses Textes ist es, für Deutschland, die USA und die europäische Ebene eine Übersicht über die verschiedenen Formen der Äußerungen zu gewinnen und ihren deren Inhalt in Form einer Synopse zusammen-zutragen, indem wesentliche Übereinstimmungen und Differenzen herausgearbeitet werden. Daneben soll die Expertise die wichtigsten Aktivitätsfelder bestimmen und konkrete Maßnahmen und Aktivitäten beschreiben, die beispielhaft für bestimmte Aktivitätsfelder stehen. Objekt ist das wissenschaftliche Kommunikationssystem als der Kommunikationszusammenhang, durch den Forschungsergebnisse innerhalb der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft mitgeteilt und verbreitet werden.},
keywords = {Open Access, Open science, Wissenschaftliche Publikationen, Wissenschaftliches Publizieren},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}